Quote

I am not a fan of Facebook or Twitter. They both allow too much information to be available and they make privacy a thing of the past.

Twitter has a several-hour advantage in getting information.

Twitter and Facebook are brilliant tools, the journalistic uses of which are still being plumbed. They are great for disseminating interesting material. They are useful for gathering information, including from places that are inaccessible.

Twitter, Facebook are so different from where I began. It's like a fire that takes off... I'm reading everybody's Twitter.

All sorts of factors contribute to what Facebook or Twitter present in a feed, or what Google or Bing show us in search results. Our expectation is that those intermediaries will provide open conduits to others' content and that the variables in their processes just help yield the information we find most relevant.

Social media is its own sort of thing: Twitter and Facebook have changed the way everyone perceives everything.

'What is Twitter?' has always been a tough question to answer.

With the evolution of social media that includes blogging, Facebook, and Twitter, who and how information is delivered has changed tremendously. The landscape for news is a different place, and people have to accept that.

The people you're friends with on Facebook or the people you follow on Twitter are trusted sources of information.

Twitter became a major place to find out what was breaking on the Internet. Facebook became a place to share links. Social media really grew up.