Soon after the 1997 election, I argued that there was no inverse law of political gravity which said that everything which went down had to come back up.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The New York Times' was enigmatic: 'Some unimaginable gravitational force is pulling our entire galaxy in the opposite direction.' End of article. If you stop and think about that, we are recreating ourselves.
The laws of the marketplace are physical laws, and they don't become suspended in a crisis any more than the law of gravity does.
It is now clear that major irregularities did not occur.
After immersing myself in the mysteries of the Electoral College for a novel I wrote in the '90s, I came away believing that the case for scrapping it is less obvious than I originally thought.
Gravity wins over all other known forces.
The reversal of a Supreme Court opinion is possible.
The law in question asserts, that the quantity of force which can be brought into action in the whole of Nature is unchangeable, and can neither be increased nor diminished.
The true scientist no longer attempts to disprove the pull of gravity, or the rotation of the earth, or the motion of heavenly bodies, or the sequence of the seasons, or man's need of food and water, or the function of the heart.
Politics follows the lines of physics: every action creates an equal and opposite reaction.
If your theory is found to be against the second law of theromodynamics, I give you no hope; there is nothing for it but to collapse in deepest humiliation.