As a guy that had been told to drop out many times as I was coming up, I don't think you should tell any candidate about what they should do and what decisions they should make.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I like candidates who tell me something that is going to make a difference to me.
I don't think the candidate would be directly responsible for things that their supporters say, but when it gets to a certain level, they ought to say, 'Cut it out.'
I'm not sure a candidate ever feels his message is getting out.
I would never tell anyone who to vote for. I'm a different kind of 'liberal' and I think people should be true to themselves. If you're Republican or Democrat, conservative or liberal, you should be true to yourself and be who you are.
Candidates don't want to be associated with poor people, people who have jobs or are ugly; they want to be associated with a certain middle class demographic, so as a result they leave those others out completely.
I just don't see anonymous sources as fair against a candidate. I think if someone has a real concern, they should come out and say it.
It's important to know enough about all of the candidates to make an informed choice, and our candidate is Hillary Clinton.
I haven't got the slightest idea how to change people, but still I keep a long list of prospective candidates just in case I should ever figure it out.
When news comes out, it ought to be reported. There shouldn't be a moratorium based on legitimate news, just because it may or may not affect one candidate or the other. That's just absurd.
I don't think anyone should pick a candidate for any office based solely on gender. That would be, I believe, a mistake.
No opposing quotes found.