The whole point of cryopreserving only one's head is based on the idea that one can simply grow in the laboratory an entire new body, without a head, and stick it onto the cryopreserved head.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
A cold in the head causes less suffering than an idea.
Heads are a good deal, and I think they would be a common feature. It's hard to think of species that don't have heads, although there are some. It's good to have a head because it puts some of the sensory organs - eyes, ears, whiskers or whatever - next to the CPU, the brain.
This planet Earth, the act of putting a roof over our heads, our flesh and blood existence, it's all very temporary.
There is a certain head, and that head you have not. Now this being so, there is a head which you have not; therefore, you are without a head.
There is no safe blow to the head, especially for a child.
We sometimes freeze the specimen with liquid nitrogen, which is extremely cold, you know. This is another technique we use now - but the specimens are not alive.
People can cry much easier than they can change.
An empty head is not really empty; it is stuffed with rubbish. Hence the difficulty of forcing anything into an empty head.
It's slightly complicated for people to grasp the idea of a head of state in human form.
We treat human biology as our center point. Everyone already has a head-mounted display. It's your head!