I don't do method acting. If I play a farmer, I'm not gonna spend 3 weeks on a chicken farm. That's a bit too much for me.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I'm not really into method acting - the way I was taught was the good old-fashioned British way of just doing your research and getting on with it.
I'm not done with acting but do find my hands full with my current responsibilities. Soon, sometime soon.
Acting is a whole boatload of fun, but I prefer to do it on my own terms.
If I wasn't acting, I would own a farm. Not like growing crops but maybe have a few animals like cows, and maybe an alpaca or a llama. I would chop wood all day. I would make a living doing that; it's, like, an idealistic scenario for me. It's very contrary to my upbringing, but maybe that's the appeal to it.
What's interesting about the process of acting is how often you don't know what you're doing.
Acting is the way I make my living.
Ultimately, the idea of acting is to understand the people you're playing, and then where they're coming from is not so mystifying. You've got to detox a bit after, though.
I wouldn't say I'm a method actor. I do research when I feel I don't have enough experience for the part I'm playing.
You know, I've never been much of a method actor. I feel like, with every project I go in extremely prepared and I like to have a good time.
I don't know if I'm a method actor.
No opposing quotes found.