Monopoly may also end in tears, but its tensions are cruder, lacking the infinitely subtle shadings of irritation and acrimony provided by Scrabble.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Competition is always a good thing. It forces us to do our best. A monopoly renders people complacent and satisfied with mediocrity.
They will come to learn in the end, at their own expense, that it is better to endure competition for rich customers than to be invested with monopoly over impoverished customers.
We don't have a monopoly. We have market share. There's a difference.
Everyone must know by now that the aim of Scrabble is to gain the moral high ground, the loser being the first player to slam the board shut and upset all the letters over the floor.
I thrive in competitive environments. I've never been in a monopoly.
Before the monopoly should be permitted, there must be reason to believe it will do some good - for society, and not just for monopoly holders.
A monopoly is like running on firm ground. Nothing compels you to move, but if you do, you move forward. The faster you run, the more scenery you see - so you have some incentive to run fast.
A moral monopoly is the antithesis of a marketplace of ideas.
I think it's wrong that only one company makes the game Monopoly.
I don't know what a monopoly is until somebody tells me.