The reporting of news has to be understood as propaganda for commodities, and events by images.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
If people in the media cannot decide whether they are in the business of reporting news or manufacturing propaganda, it is all the more important that the public understand that difference, and choose their news sources accordingly.
News represents another form of advertising, not liberal propaganda.
Newspaper reporting is really storytelling. We call our articles 'stories,' and we try to tell them in a way that even people who don't know all the background can understand them.
At times, some journalists see nothing in the people apart from an opportunity to make material gain. They see them as consumers to whom we sell commodities at huge profits that keep our bank accounts growing.
I think most things I read on the Internet and in newspapers are propaganda. Everyone from the 'New York Times' to Rupert Murdoch has a point of view and is putting forth their own propaganda. They're stuck with the facts as they are, but the way they interpret and frame them is wildly different.
Television news is now entertainment, and the stories are being written by the people that have a special interest in them.
Television's very dependent on images. That's not what news is.
Most campaigns rely on photographs because the moment you do something that is a graphic interpretation where any artistic license has been taken, I think a lot of people are scared that it's going to be perceived as propaganda.
You have to understand the separation between what exists in the print media and what exists in reality. It's important to never lose track of reality.
It is the emergence of mass media which makes possible the use of propaganda techniques on a societal scale.
No opposing quotes found.