Nothing is less predictable than the development of an active scientific field.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I think science fiction is very bad at prediction.
Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future.
I've never been able to predict the future of anything.
Prediction is certainly a valuable goal in science, but not the only one. Explanation is also important, and there are plenty of sciences that do a lot of explaining and not much predicting.
Nobody wants a prediction that the future will be more or less like the present, even if that is, statistically speaking, an excellent prediction.
We have this very clean picture of science, you know, these well-established rules with which we make predictions. But when you're really doing science, when you're doing research, you're at the edge of what we know.
Perhaps one day earthquakes, hurricanes and financial crashes will all be predictable. But we don't have to wait until then for seismology, meteorology and economics to become sciences; they already are.
In order to predict effectively, we need to use science. And the reason that we need to use science is because then we can reproduce what we're doing; it's not just wisdom or guesswork. And if we can predict, then we can engineer the future.
Those who have knowledge, don't predict. Those who predict, don't have knowledge.
We certainly will prepare consciously and professionally, but still you cannot predict the future.
No opposing quotes found.