I defend the right of almost everything to be published... because I think that you're better off in trusting the marketplace than allowing other people to make that decision.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I think people are confusing the right to write with the right to be published.
There is a marvelous peace in not publishing. It's peaceful. Still. Publishing is a terrible invasion of my privacy.
Everything I publish is for my readers.
I like to reserve the right to write about whatever I like.
Publishing for me is a business, not an ideology.
Some people are just so happy to get published to, they sign anything. Next thing you know, they've signed over the rights to their book.
I try to keep all my novels in print. Sometimes publishers don't agree with me as to their worth.
I have a problem with censorship by the lawyer - by legal people by the publishing firm, and I may be changing publishers. They don't seem to want to take too many risks with living people.
If I am thinking the same as everyone why bother pushing to get it published?
We like to engage in a normal publishing effort, which is to act in a responsible manner and make sure the material is not likely to harm anyone, that it is properly investigated by quality news organizations, and by lawyers and human rights groups and so on.