In the spirit of science, there really is no such thing as a 'failed experiment.' Any test that yields valid data is a valid test.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Sometimes you can fail in an experiment. But if you fail, you still don't stop observing that thing, looking for a better way.
There are people who say that you can't experiment... That condemns you to failure.
I think I've failed every test I've ever taken. If there was a failure I would have been it.
You can imagine: 99 percent of your experiments fail for one reason or another.
There is no such thing as failure. There are only results.
It's not an experiment if you know it's going to work.
With science, there is this culture of experimentation, and most of the time, those experiments fail.
You accept failure as a possible outcome of some of the experiments. If you don't get failures, you're not pushing hard enough on the objectives.
If you assume that it was a valid experiment, then its disintegration reveals a very substantial part of what has been found since then, including the fact that you can get heat generation at high temperature.
Of course, not everybody's willing to go out and do the experiments, but for the people who are willing to go out and do that, - if the experiments don't work, then it means it's not science.
No opposing quotes found.