Philosophy would render us entirely Pyrrhonian, were not nature too strong for it.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Invoking nature with its implied supremacy ignores that many cultures have fundamentally differing ideas of even what nature is, much less how it should work.
If we had this back, and in full measure; if society were infused by it, through and through, and men lived its life, and in its life, philosophy would take care of itself and the nature of our institutions would not matter.
You see, nature will do exactly what it must, and if we are a hindrance to its development, to even its destructive powers to reform itself and we are in a way, we will go.
To me there is nothing that goes against nature. If it seems incomprehensible, it's only because we haven't been able to understand it yet.
Nature uses as little as possible of anything.
Anything created by human beings is already in the great book of nature.
All I ask is that we compare human consciousness with spirochete ecology.
It can't be Nature, for it is not sense.
Any suggestion that science and religion are incompatible flies in the face of history, logic, and common sense.
Only an unscientific ignoramus would hold to the thought that nothing created everything.