I think that the digital media are interesting enough in their own right to be worth originating something in.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
People wanted me to do a CD-ROM of 'Hitchhiker's,' and I thought, 'No, no.' I didn't want to just sort of reverse-engineer yet another thing from a book I'd already written. I think that the digital media are interesting enough in their own right to be worth originating something in.
Digital media has destroyed much of the magic and mystery of the medium.
Sooner rather than later, any other form other than digital media will be a thing of the past. It won't vanish, but let's face it, this is seemingly the way of the future.
Everyone seems to think that digital technology devoids the medium of content, but that is not true at all. If anything, it broadens the content.
I think media people know we're good at making content and how we can be smart about how to consume it. It's always a balance.
I don't think there are too many traditional media guys who really understood what the new digital media is about.
To be honest with you, I worry about concentration of ownership in media, where you have a handful of media conglomerates largely controlling what we see, hear and read.
I think it is valuable and should be valued by its consumers. Charging for content forces discipline on journalists: they must produce things that people actually value.
People try to read a lot into what 'digital' means. It's just another platform. There are very attractive things that happen if you invest in content - movies, TV production, acquired series, specialty genres, digital distribution of our magazines, sports rights.
Digital technology allows us a much larger scope to tell stories that were pretty much the grounds of the literary media.
No opposing quotes found.