Male founders who come across as Type B are more likely to get the benefit of the doubt.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
It's against type in the sense of my background, but it's with type in the sense that I am a loner who's new to this business and sceptical about a lot of it.
The venture community is largely male.
There's an opportunity to make your board - and your company - smarter by adding diversity, especially of gender.
We're raised to believe that black men have to be one specific way.
The male corporate model is built on a man's greater willingness to be a slave of sorts - especially once he has to provide for children.
Like Leibniz's possible worlds, most men are only equally entitled pretenders to existence. There are few existences.
Who knows the minds of men and how they reason and what their methodology is? But I am not going to extrapolate from the General Conference backing out on my book and make it a personal issue.
Men are apt to prefer a prosperous error to an afflicted truth.
My only concern is that the L.A. Times opinion pages, unfortunately like too many in this country, are dominated by men, and I'd like to see that change.
For the men, they are more of a risk taker, and for the women, they are more nurturing and more details. So the combination of the men and women is very good for business.
No opposing quotes found.