What is certain is that plurality and diversity are not, and never can be, a natural 'byproduct' of unregulated market forces.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Diversity is really a richness for mankind.
I think diversity can also be a resource, an asset, especially in a world that is becoming globalized, to deal with difference, to deal with variety, to deal with complexity.
When advertisers ignore diversity, it is because they don't think the lives of others matter. There is not enough of a financial imperative for those lives to matter.
The fact is that the diversity in this political class serves the same interest as diversity in any arena, which is it stirs the competitive pot.
I think every market has lot of things in common, and at the same time, every market has lot of different things.
It is easy to see why a diversity of cultures should confront power with a problem. If culture is about plurality, power is about unity. How can it sell itself simultaneously to a whole range of life forms without being fatally diluted?
Thus, the forces and value systems that are most threatened by this shift are becoming the most coherent and are rising to the top as minority or plurality powers. But they do not represent either the shift, the change, or the future.
My fundamental tenets are concerned with freedom of the individual; the market isn't perfect, but it's the best available way of allocating resources.
Diversity is America's most valuable resource. It is what makes us the most innovative nation on Earth.
There's a pure and simple business case for diversity: Companies that are more diverse are more successful.