I always felt that a painted edge between two colors was a depiction somehow.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
At first I had some idea that the absence of color made the work more physical. Early on I was very involved with the notion of the painting as an object and tended to attack that idea from different directions.
I started doing sculpture in 1959. I had no commissions then. They were painted, similar in style to the paintings... At a certain point, I decided I didn't want an edge between two colors, I wanted color differences in literal space.
You know I was curious - I was interested in all kinds of mystery or deeper meanings in the paintings because I myself have not analyzed why they have turned out like this or like that.
Every time I started painting it was like a new experience, but they all came out the same.
Simultaneous contrast is not just a curious optical phenomenon - it is the very heart of painting.
Painting is an illusion, a piece of magic, so what you see is not what you see.
It became clear to me that I had to push it toward a more representational way of drawing.
I painted the picture, and in the colors the rhythm of the music quivers. I painted the colors I saw.
The artist must ask you to think of the world in a different way, and sometimes it's a more abstract way; sometimes it's a completely different kind of colouring.
Why do two colors, put one next to the other, sing? Can one really explain this? no. Just as one can never learn how to paint.