You know, if you need 100 rounds to kill a deer, maybe hunting isn't your sport.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
If you need more than 10 rounds to hunt, and some argue they hunt with that many rounds, you shouldn't be hunting. If you can't get the deer in 3 shots, you shouldn't be hunting. You are an embarrassment.
I don't believe you need high capacity magazines to go hunt. If you have to use 100 rounds to shoot a deer, you're in trouble.
When you have a high-volume magazine or an assault weapon, you're not hunting deer or protecting your home; you're out to hunt people.
Anyone who thinks hunters are just 'bloodthirsty morons' hasn't looked into hunting. If you wait through long, cold hours in the November woods with a bow in your hands hoping a buck will show, or if you spend days walking in the African bush trailing Cape buffalo while listening to lions roar, you're sure to learn hunting isn't about killing.
I shoot the same rifle I've shot since I killed my first deer with it when I was nine.
I was not meant to go deer hunting every fall.
We ought to ban hunting, I suggest, if there isn't a purpose other than sport and fun. That should be against the law. It's time now.
With all due respect to the nation's fish and game departments, more deer die because people hunt them than because people feed them.
I don't oppose hunting in any way, shape or form. If that's what you enjoy doing, you are free to do it.
Hunting is not a sport. In a sport, both sides should know they're in the game.