I think an interview, properly considered, should be an investigation. You shouldn't know what the interview will yield. Otherwise, why do it at all?
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Job-interviewing is just a skill. Like any skill, some people have more of a predisposition for it than others.
So interviews are a valuable tool, but under certain circumstances they'd be more valuable than others.
I am certainly more interested in interviewing than being interviewed. Sometimes you find yourself attacked from the start.
The long, forensic interview really matters.
I do interviews because it's a chance to be myself. I sometimes wonder what I could have to say that would be of any interest. I don't have any great wisdom.
You've gotta understand - when you interview someone, it's not an interrogation. It's not the Nuremberg Trials.
An investigation may take six months. A quick interview, profile, a day.
It is harder to lie in an interview. A good interview - and it can be polite - is not a one way street like a candidate controlled ad. An interview is not programmed by the candidate and so the candidate can't be exactly sure what will be asked.
I don't know if it was much of an interview. We just shot the breeze.
I don't see the point of doing an interview unless you're going to share the things you learn in life and the mistakes you make. So to admit that I'm extremely human and have done some dark things I don't think makes me unusual or unusually dark. I think it actually is the right thing to do, and I'd like to think it's the nice thing to do.
No opposing quotes found.