Sometimes groups and their material can get overbloated.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Groups tend to believe their work is harder, more strategic, or just more valuable while underestimating those contributions from other groups.
Groups break up because they never got across what they wanted to do personally, and they have creative differences, and egos start to clash.
Writers sometimes give up what is most strange and wonderful about their writing - soften their roughest edges - to accommodate themselves toward a group response.
Groupthink can become a serious issue - old ideas stay around after they're useful, and new ideas too often don't get a fair hearing.
Most groups today aren't groups. In a true group all the members create the arrangements among themselves.
Groups are grammatical fictions; only individuals exist, and each individual is different.
I don't really like groups that make the same statement over and over again. It's good, but kind of predictable.
Sometimes the problem is not the people in the band, but the people around the band.
Everything's always about being homogenized and following in a group. The people who stand out always have the most problems.
The reason is that in a group, individual errors on either side of the true figure cancel each other out.
No opposing quotes found.