Groups break up because they never got across what they wanted to do personally, and they have creative differences, and egos start to clash.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
When you get together in a group, it becomes like a family, with the different personalities and the politics that comes with being in a band. It's different than bringing something in by yourself.
There's something really interesting about having those close friends that you've had incredible times with but growing up and away from them. The underlying tensions, the shifting in the group dynamic, the little lies you tell to big yourself up: it's something that happens to us all.
Sometimes groups and their material can get overbloated.
It's quite ironic I suppose, it's that thing about being in a group when you all start out as friends and then invariably end up hating each other. So I just thought they needed telling really, in case they were labouring under the apprehension that they were still friends.
The problem is, of course, that these interest groups are all asking for changes, but their enthusiasm for change rapidly disappears when it affects the core of their own interests.
Groupthink can become a serious issue - old ideas stay around after they're useful, and new ideas too often don't get a fair hearing.
It's sad when people break up.
Groups tend to believe their work is harder, more strategic, or just more valuable while underestimating those contributions from other groups.
No one in the group was really growing up besides me, which is pretty weird 'cause there was no one in that group more self-destructive than I was.
Everything's always about being homogenized and following in a group. The people who stand out always have the most problems.
No opposing quotes found.