Groups tend to believe their work is harder, more strategic, or just more valuable while underestimating those contributions from other groups.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The productivity of a work group seems to depend on how the group members see their own goals in relation to the goals of the organization.
The people that you work with, the organizations that are committed to the same objectives. If they know that you're in it together, and you're working towards the same objectives, and you agree on how to do more with less, you can actually have a greater impact.
There are two kinds of people, those who do the work and those who take the credit. Try to be in the first group; there is less competition there.
Individual commitment to a group effort - that is what makes a team work, a company work, a society work, a civilization work.
At some point, a group of people working towards similar goals will exhibit a distribution of performance.
There is always strength in numbers. The more individuals or organizations that you can rally to your cause, the better.
Group discussion is very valuable; group drafting is less productive.
In any group there is more or less tension between people, and there are complicities and affinities.
Because the better an organization is at fulfilling its purpose, the more it attracts people who see the organization as an opportunity to advance themselves.
Sometimes groups and their material can get overbloated.
No opposing quotes found.