Not that pleading can be taken as a test, for the forms of action, notably Debt, ignore the fundamental difference between duties imposed by law and duties created by the will of the parties.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The law serves of nought else in these days but for to do wrong, for nothing is spread almost but false matters by color of the law for reward, dread and favor and so no remedy is had in the Court of Equity in any way.
Decisions on a matter as serious as charging an individual with a crime cannot be decided on anything less than complete examination of all available evidence. Anything less is not justice.
There is respect for law, and then there is complicity in lawlessness.
Obedience of the law is demanded; not asked as a favor.
In law a man is guilty when he violates the rights of others. In ethics he is guilty if he only thinks of doing so.
If the laws could speak for themselves, they would complain of the lawyers.
One cannot tell the High Court what to adjudicate. They must judge, and then the legislature must act accordingly.
No man can be subject to any laws, excepting those which have received the assent of himself or his representatives and which are promulgated beforehand and applied legally.
Lying under oath, and encouraging lies under oath, does go to the very heart and soul of what courts do. If we say we don't care, let's forget about courts, and we'll just have other ways of figuring out how to handle disputes.
A promise made is a debt unpaid.