I mean, don't forget the earth's about five thousand million years old, at least. Who can afford to live in the past?
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The ability to live for five hundred years would be an incredible gift. But I greatly fear it would be a gift only for the wealthy - one that might greatly widen the gap between those with access and those without.
The future that I will not live to see is the one my children will live in. That's my immortality. And I shouldn't try to mortgage theirs for my benefit.
There are people who would love to spend their last ten years, or five years, or whatever it is, on the surface of Mars.
The future, according to some scientists, will be exactly like the past, only far more expensive.
Humans have lived for much, much longer than the approximately 10,000 years of settled agricultural civilization.
We would like to live as we once lived, but history will not permit it.
But if we begin thinking about the world being over 100 million years old, then it's absolutely by chance that you and I are sitting here alive today, while all the others are dead or have never been born.
Isn't it a shame that future generations can't be here to see all the wonderful things we're doing with their money?
I think that we're living in a time where there are trillion-dollar opportunities that never existed before.
You have to live in the future, not the past.
No opposing quotes found.