In the long run, men hit only what they aim at. Therefore, they had better aim at something high.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
One may miss the mark by aiming too high as too low.
The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark.
If you would hit the mark, you must aim a little above it.
Aim high, and you won't shoot your foot off.
I believe more in precision, when you have the capability, like when you see a mosquito fly and you're able to hit it, you're able to hit it with a couple of short sharp shots... it's a beautiful thing.
It is far more important to be able to hit the target than it is to haggle over who makes a weapon or who pulls a trigger.
Generally, I just think there is a real lacking in men knowing how to hit on women.
If you aim at nothing, you'll hit it every time.
If I'm going to get hit, why let the guy who's going to hit me get the easiest and best shot? I explode into the guy who's trying to tackle me.
For a man to strike any women is most brutal, and I, as well as everyone else, think this far worse than any attempt to shoot, which, wicked as it is, is at least more comprehensible and more courageous.
No opposing quotes found.