On some campuses, change is effected through nonviolent or even violent means.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Real change is always violent, but it may hurt a lot less than what's in place before the violence occurs.
There is no fundamental social change by being simply of individual and interpersonal actions. You have to have organizations and institutions that make a fundamental difference.
It's hard to say whether the general incidence of school violence of all types is increasing or not.
The relationship between violence and nonviolence in this country is interesting. The fact of the matter is, you know, people do respond to riots. The 1968 Housing Act was in large response to riots that broke out after Dr. Martin Luther King was killed. They cited these as an actual inspiration.
There is no accurate or useful 'profile' of students who engage in targeted school violence. Some come from good homes, some from bad. Some have good grades, some bad.
There is a subconscious way of taking violence as a way of expression, as a normality, and it has a lot of effects in the youth in the way they absorb education and what they hope to get out of life.
Once we accept violence as an adaptation, it makes sense that its expression is calibrated to the environment. The same individual will behave differently if he comes of age in Detroit, Mich., versus Windsor, Ontario; in New York in the 1980s versus New York now; in a culture of honor versus a culture of dignity.
Technology, ideology, and social and cultural changes periodically throw out new forms of violence for humanity to contend with.
We've got to look to our educational programs and focus on doing what we can to stem violence in the schools.
One is called to live nonviolently, even if the change one works for seems impossible.