Restrictions are difficult to enforce in a world where anybody can make anything.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
There is no privilege in restriction. In other words, I disagree with people who say restriction makes you more creative. I think that's a misleading slogan. I might have been more creative without them than with them.
For me, restrictions are not always negative. Restrictions can push creativity. I like restrictions.
Rules are to be initiated for the allotment of scarce raw materials etc; and their use and processing for other than war, or otherwise absolutely vital, goods is prohibited.
I mean, anything that money can be made off will never be a problem to make, no matter what it is.
It's much better to have rules that we can actually live within. And absolute prohibitions, generally, are not the kind of rules that countries would live within.
The problem is you cannot have free global trade with highly restrictive, regulated domestic markets.
People feel that they're being required to meet all sorts of regulations and rules and requirements in their areas of work and MPs are not imposing those sort of restrictions on themselves.
Every new rule, mandate, and regulatory edict is one more obstacle that small business owners, entrepreneurs, and job creators have to swallow.
A lot of great creativity comes from restrictions.
The condition every art requires is, not so much freedom from restriction, as freedom from adulteration and from the intrusion of foreign matter.
No opposing quotes found.