I suppose sequels are inevitable for a writer of a certain age.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I think sequels are fine if there's a story, so I think when there is a property that is worthy of a sequel, it could very well happen!
As we all know, sequels can be tricky.
My gut feeling about sequels is that they should be premeditated: You should try to write a trilogy first or at least sketch out a trilogy if you have any faith in your film.
I'm not big on sequels; I've done them, but I like doing little things that have their own timelessness to them, classic type things, and then you go onto something new.
I don't know if I would do sequels. I almost feel like when I'm done with them, they're going to have to find their own way.
I hate the idea of sequels. I think you should be able to do it in one book.
Nowadays it seems as though people sit down to write what they know is going to be a trilogy.
The only reason I would write a sequel is if I were struck by an idea that I felt to be equal to the original. Too many sequels diminish the original.
I think sequels should be earned and we won't do it unless the script is better than the first one.
I think a sequel is a waste of money and time. I think movies should illuminate new stories.