Morale is good; troops are confident; leaders are capable.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
A military coup needs a sacrifice and courage that you can't find in an army without morale.
I think attacks on civilians in fact boost morale.
Military leaders aren't made. They are born. To be a good leader, you have to have something in your character to cause people to follow you.
Our generals talk a good game about taking care of their grunts, and the majority of our Beltway politicians bay with moralistic fervor about how they, too, support the troops.
Soldiers, when committed to a task, can't compromise. It's unrelenting devotion to the standards of duty and courage, absolute loyalty to others, not letting the task go until it's been done.
War is not only a matter of equipment, artillery, group troops or air force; it is largely a matter of spirit, or morale.
Honor bespeaks worth. Confidence begets trust. Service brings satisfaction. Cooperation proves the quality of leadership.
Military preparedness is absolutely a form of strength.
Enter the candidates on horseback: While military leaders can sometimes be dangerous in politics, our best generals and admirals embody the democratic values and leadership skills for which the country is yearning.
Military strength in reserve is better than military strength being reigned upon the other side including all of its innocent civilians.
No opposing quotes found.