It's almost impossible that an argument would naturally form the kind of arch that it does in 'Lifespan'. So, the conversation is constructed.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
We're still living with the old paradigm of age as an arch. That's the old metaphor: You're born, you peak at midlife and decline into decrepitude.
The best argument I know for an immortal life is the existence of a man who deserves one.
To sustain longevity, you have to evolve.
Without stones there is no arch.
It's always good to have a story arch.
I'd rather lose an argument than get into a long discussion in order to win it.
Archimedes will be remembered when Aeschylus is forgotten, because languages die and mathematical ideas do not.
It must be understood that every architecture is bound to its time and manifests itself only in vital tasks and through the materials of its age. It has never been otherwise.
A lasting architecture has to have roots.
All experience is an arch, to build upon.