In cloning, in contrast, reproduction is asexual - the cloned child is the product not of two but of one.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The cloning procedure is similar to IVF. The only difference is that the DNA of sperm and egg would be replaced by DNA from an adult cell. What law or principle - secular, humanist, or religious - says that one combination of genetic material in a flask is OK, but another is not?
Cloning represents a very clear, powerful, and immediate example in which we are in danger of turning procreation into manufacture.
Cloning looks like a degrading of parenthood and a perversion of the right relation between parents and children.
There are two kinds of cloning right now. One is therapeutic cloning which is for coming up with cures for life threatening, really, really awful diseases. Then there is reproductive cloning, which is to make a human being out of your DNA and a donor egg.
If one is seriously interested in preventing reproductive cloning, one must stop the process before it starts.
Human cloning is coming.
No one would want to read a book in which I explain the science of cloning because it would be very dull and it would also make no sense.
Cloning, wow. Who would have thought? There should be a list of people who can and cannot clone themselves.
There is absolutely no doubt about it, and I may not be the one that does it, but the cloned child is coming. There is absolutely no way that it will not happen.
Like the 'test tube babies' born of in vitro fertilization, cloned children need not be identifiable, much less freaks or outcasts.