Quote

I see the business side of it and moving up the ladder towards the title. That's where the money's at. That's the overall goal.

While I'm confident in Obsidian being able to deliver a quality title, it only takes one other Kickstarter developer to ruin things for everyone else and cast doubt on the donation process going forward.

It quite often happens that they attach a name to a project and it doesn't get all the financing it needs.

Title IX came along and changed a lot of things for the better, but nevertheless, it meant that money became more important.

If you can provide the funding and you get the leadership, you'll have a competitive team.

Obviously any group that has to have funding also needs to get attention to their issues.

If there are only three guys at the top of the organization handling things, it's the definition of a bankrupt company. In creating leaders without titles, we are going to have organizations with people at the helm putting forth their best.

At the end of the day, VCs have to provide their limited partners with great returns, or they aren't going to be able to raise another fund.

Because the better an organization is at fulfilling its purpose, the more it attracts people who see the organization as an opportunity to advance themselves.

Charities must treat donors as if they were shareholders.