With 500 channels and the Internet available, you'd think a candidate could get the word out.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Right now, with social networks and other tools on the Internet, all of these 500 million people have a way to say what they're thinking and have their voice be heard.
At this point, I can't say what network would be picking it up, but I know that it would be a success.
Isn't it only appropriate that, in return for the free use of the public spectrum, broadcasters provide something substantial, something that wouldn't otherwise be provided by marketplace competition?
If you interviewed 1,000 politicians and asked about whether the media's too soft or too hard, about 999 would say too hard.
The internet population is going up and up. I am confident that this will be a huge market.
You could put on monkeys jumping up and down and get bigger numbers than MSNBC.
If millions of Americans choose to weigh in on the outcome of 'American Idol' through text messages and the Web, then why not harness similar technological tools to encourage discourse on the political landscape?
I envision a future where there'll be 300 million reporters, where anyone from anywhere can report for any reason. It's freedom of participation absolutely realized.
Corporate communications will become a high-tech art, just as political communication is for Obama.
Solutions-oriented campaigning with a little passion and a little humor; I think that will go a long way. I think people are desperate for it.
No opposing quotes found.