If you simply announce that things are irrational, then that alone doesn't get you very far. You have to replace rational agents with some concrete notion of what it means to be irrational.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
If something is irrational, that means it won't work. It's usually unrealistic.
Even the most analytical thinkers are predictably irrational; the really smart ones acknowledge and address their irrationalities.
I believe, in the stock market - that's one of my fields - that most people are irrational. And to be irrational, you can be irrational in so many different ways that, practically, the result is indeterminate.
The irrationality of a thing is no argument against its existence, rather a condition of it.
Human beings are the only creatures who are able to behave irrationally in the name of reason.
Irrationality interests me more than anything: sometimes it's very dangerous, but it can be incredibly beautiful.
Since all life is futility, then the decision to exist must be the most irrational of all.
I never got good at predicting what millions of people will suddenly decide is rational.
If individuals are rational, there is no need to protect them against their own choices.
By the way, the point between rationality and what we would call the irrational is a very difficult point to establish. There's no specific line, as you know.