Quote

Very rarely do firearms restrictions affect criminals. They really only affect law-abiding citizens.

I don't believe there should be any restrictions when it comes to firearms. None.

Gun bans disarm victims, putting them at the mercy of murderers or terrorists who think nothing of breaking the gun laws.

As gun owners, my husband and I understand that the Second Amendment is most at risk when a criminal or deranged person commits a gun crime. These acts only embolden those who oppose gun ownership. Promoting responsible gun laws protects the Second Amendment and reduces lives lost from guns.

It's not law-abiding gun owners that are the problem here - it's Islamic terrorists.

Americans have the right under the Second Amendment to own firearms, and that is not going to change.

Every time guns fall into the wrong hands and are used to intimidate, injure, or murder women, it erodes the rights of responsible gun owners everywhere.

You can have bans on assault weapons or whatever weapons you wish, and it's not going to protect from a violent person.

The most cogent principle that can be drawn from traditional limitations on the right to keep and bear arms is that dangerous persons likely to use firearms for illicit purposes were not understood to be protected by the Second Amendment.