Gun bans disarm victims, putting them at the mercy of murderers or terrorists who think nothing of breaking the gun laws.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
You can have bans on assault weapons or whatever weapons you wish, and it's not going to protect from a violent person.
Understanding the long, sordid history of gun control in America is key to understanding the dangers of disarming.
I believe that restricting the rights of law-abiding gun owners will not prevent a deranged individual or criminal from obtaining and misusing firearms to commit violence.
They need to enforce how and who to give guns to. But there are Americans like me who are responsible, and they shouldn't take that away. If they outlaw guns, they won't take mine.
I think you can ban guns if you can just pull the trigger and 60 bullets fire out.
Banning guns addresses a fundamental right of all Americans to feel safe.
Nobody is going to try to confiscate guns, although some Web sites know better: President Obama, they are certain, wants to.
Guns are the ultimate bulwark against government misbehavior.
In the myopic world of the liberals, guns are responsible for evil instead of the perpetrator of evil. But criminals are not bound by our laws. That's what makes them criminals.
There is no way the American public will sit still for the banning of or putting any significant restrictions on the kinds of guns they want.
No opposing quotes found.