I have a theory of living on the boundary: on the boundary of patriarchy and the boundary of different dimensions.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
To an intellectual who is adrift in politics, a theory is an aim; to a true politician his theory is a boundary.
Probably all the books I've ever written have been efforts to define the boundaries of humanity.
Every human being must have boundaries in order to have successful relationships or a successful performance in life.
I'm interested in writing that explores all sides of human beings.
And this is one of the major questions of our lives: how we keep boundaries, what permission we have to cross boundaries, and how we do so.
The boundaries which divide Life from Death are at best shadowy and vague. Who shall say where the one ends, and where the other begins?
What interests me are the complexities and contradictions and struggles and joys of messy human beings.
In a sense, all of my books have been about a 'poisonous pedagogy,' which engenders a culture of obedience, this underlying theme of patriarchal systems.
I'll never be known for my work with boundaries.
A boundary is really something artificial we made up. The ecosystem and landscape continue.