You cannot always make such big exhibitions, because they consume too much time and energy.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I'm constantly making exhibitions in my head.
Exhibitions are kind of ephemeral moments, sometimes magic moments, and when they're gone, they're gone.
These small shows were decidedly a success. The exhibitions were not too large to be seen easily. It was not an effort, as larger collections of pictures usually are.
I'm trying to expand the notion of curating. Exhibitions need not only take place in galleries, need not only involve displaying objects. Art can appear where we expect it least.
Works of art often last forever, or nearly so. But exhibitions themselves, especially gallery exhibitions, are like flowers; they bloom and then they die, then exist only as memories, or pressed in magazines and books.
I prefer to see a good exhibit sponsored by a brand than a bad exhibit due to lack of funds.
Museums, I think, are becoming more and more aware of how to turn themselves into a must-see spectacle.
Small museums are great. Big museums are a drag.
I don't often go to curator or artist walk-throughs of exhibitions. For a critic, it feels like cheating. I want to see shows with my own eyes, making my own mistakes, viewing exhibitions the way most of their audience sees them.
I love to be in front of big galleries.
No opposing quotes found.