As a citizen, as a public scientist, I can tell you that Einstein essentially overturned a so strongly established paradigm of science, whereas Darwin didn't really overturn a science paradigm.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Darwin himself recorded the fact that he accepted the Malthusian idea.
If you take Darwin's theory and extend it to its logical end, it can be used to justify a number of very horrendous things.
If Mr. Einstein doesn't like the natural laws of the universe, let him go back to where he came from.
In arguing that machines think, we are in the same fix as Darwin when he argued that man shares common ancestors with monkeys, or Galileo when he argued that the Earth spins on its axis.
As a world view, Darwinism cannot of course be refuted, since Faith is, always has been, and always will be, stronger than facts.
Biology has progressed tremendously due to the model that Darwin put forth. But the black boxes Darwin accepted are now being opened, and our view of the world is again being shaken.
Einstein was adamant in rejecting all ideas of a personal god.
Science is global. Einstein's equation, E=mc2, has to reach everywhere. Science is a beautiful gift to humanity, we should not distort it. Science does not differentiate between multiple races.
Einstein's results again turned the tables and now very few philosophers or scientists still think that scientific knowledge is, or can be, proven knowledge.
People say I am against Darwin. That is ridiculous.
No opposing quotes found.