An actor shouldn't undergo psychoanalysis, because there are a lot of things you're better off not knowing.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I'm not a Method actor. I don't believe acting should be psychodrama. I look within myself and see what I can find to play the role with. If I'm playing a blind man, I don't go around blindfolded for days. A lot of good actors would, but I don't go in for that very much. I like to just make it up as I go along.
Horror audiences don't need to see some TV actor they're familiar with.
Psychoanalysis is a terribly efficient instrument, and because it is more and more a prestigious instrument, we run the risk of using it with a purpose for which it was not made for, and in this way we may degrade it.
I know that Wes Craven feels watching horror films does have a psychological effect, in a good way. It is very cathartic. He might be right about that.
Psychoanalysis is out, under a therapeutic disguise, to do away entirely with the moral faculty in man.
Psychoanalysis is that mental illness for which it regards itself as therapy.
My view of actors is that basically they're all harmless lunatics who'd be on the psychiatrist's couch, except that we get this sort of catharsis every six months or so, and we go and be absolutely someone else.
Psychoanalysts are not occupied with the minds of their patients; they do not believe in the mind but in a cerebral intestine.
I mean being a writer is like being a psychoanalyst, but you don't get any patients.
The problem of psychoanalysis is not the body of theory that Freud left behind, but the fact that it never became a medical science. It never tried to test its ideas.
No opposing quotes found.