Well, you know, one lawyer says I'm the only witness and I'm not credible. Another lawyer says this witness - there's tons of evidence that's been available for years.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
A man is not primarily a witness against something. That is only incidental to the fact that he is a witness for something.
I was not inside the bank. But I am still not the only witness.
It is unfair to believe everything we hear about lawyers, some of it might not be true.
The lawyer's truth is not Truth, but consistency or a consistent expediency.
Testimony should be a philosophical problem and not limited to legal or historical contexts where it refers to the account of a witness who reports what he has seen.
No one's calling me for lawyer roles. I still have a lot to do to prove myself.
In reality, those rare few cases with good forensic evidence are the ones that make it to court.
If I don't believe it, then they don't need me on the court. I've just got to believe that in my heart.
Testimony gives something to be interpreted.
A witness, in the sense that I am using the word, is a man whose life and faith are so completely one that when the challenge comes to step out and testify for his faith, he does so, disregarding all risks, accepting all consequences.
No opposing quotes found.