A man is not primarily a witness against something. That is only incidental to the fact that he is a witness for something.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
A witness, in the sense that I am using the word, is a man whose life and faith are so completely one that when the challenge comes to step out and testify for his faith, he does so, disregarding all risks, accepting all consequences.
Testimony should be a philosophical problem and not limited to legal or historical contexts where it refers to the account of a witness who reports what he has seen.
There is no witness so terrible and no accuser so powerful as conscience which dwells within us.
Well, you know, one lawyer says I'm the only witness and I'm not credible. Another lawyer says this witness - there's tons of evidence that's been available for years.
Testimony gives something to be interpreted.
A trial without witnesses, when it involves a criminal accusation, a criminal matter, is not a true trial.
Standing as a witness in all things means being kind in all things, being the first to say hello, being the first to smile, being the first to make the stranger feel a part of things, being helpful, thinking of others' feelings, being inclusive.
There is a difference between a voyeur and a tender witness. Maybe I think the audience is more of a tender witness than a voyeur, which has a shady undertone.
Standing as a witness in all things means all things - big things, little things, in all conversations, in jokes, in games played and books read and music listened to, in causes supported, in service rendered, in clothes worn, in friends made.
Testimony demands to be interpreted because of the dialectic of meaning and event that traverses it.
No opposing quotes found.