Everything you see is filtered through your visual system (imperfect) and your brain (also imperfect, despite what your mom told you). Witness testimony is the worst kind of evidence in science.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Testimony should be a philosophical problem and not limited to legal or historical contexts where it refers to the account of a witness who reports what he has seen.
Testimony gives something to be interpreted.
Testimony always comes from people who are in some way disempowered.
There is no witness so terrible and no accuser so powerful as conscience which dwells within us.
Testifying has helped me understand that one individual's behavior and actions make a difference. That my actions are important to people other than myself.
The experience of testifying and the aftermath have changed my life.
Well, you know, one lawyer says I'm the only witness and I'm not credible. Another lawyer says this witness - there's tons of evidence that's been available for years.
Testimony is personal knowledge, based upon the witness of the Holy Ghost, that certain facts of eternal significance are true.
Perhaps the most telling witness against the claim of accurate history for the Bible comes when we read the earliest narrative of the crucifixion found in Mark's gospel and discover that it is not based on eyewitness testimony at all.
One problem was that my direct testimony was in writing, so a lot of people didn't get to see it. I hope they see it, because I think it built a very strong case.
No opposing quotes found.