Assuming a specific resource is high cost is often a path to disruption when someone makes a different assumption.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Resources are being destroyed, and if you don't have resources, you can't do business.
The mistake that makes launching a venture expensive is when you try to make a disruptive technology so good that it can compete on a quality basis with an established product.
People go out; they take risk; they find a way to develop resources that were previously not accessible, not available because of technological reasons.
It is critical to bundle all future variable costs of supporting the customer in order to fairly estimate the future contribution.
A big part of finding the right resources is knowing what to look for and what to avoid.
There are companies that are cutting their costs by over 50% by offshoring.
Although it's difficult, if not impossible, to put a dollar value on the numerous services nature provides, leaving them out of economic calculations means they are often ignored.
It is rather a problem of how to secure the best use of resources known to any of the members of society, for ends whose relative importance only those individuals know.
The Internet provides the access to resources, so it's incumbent upon the people who control those resources to make sure that the economic engine stays intact.
When your product solves a problem that costs customers sleep, revenue, or profits, things are definitely looking up.
No opposing quotes found.