In my opinion, it is not in our interest to have complicated negotiations with a region, and then have to follow it up with 535 negotiations at home. I have experienced recounts, and it is better to vote once.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Having led many negotiations with countries outside the E.U. in the past, we would never enter the same compromises and reach the same good outcomes with states that don't shoulder the responsibilities and costs of the common market.
I'm not big with negotiating.
Of course as a small country you're not necessarily in the strongest negotiating position unless you're negotiating with other small countries.
Everything is negotiable. Whether or not the negotiation is easy is another thing.
We must stay focused on the bilateral negotiations between the Palestinians and us.
We've talked to the Europeans about it. It's clear if those negotiations fail, then we are agreed with the Europeans that the next step is to take the matter to the U.N. Security Council.
America is interested in re-arranging the region as it sees fit.
And, perhaps most importantly, regional conflicts will again and again confront us with a cruel choice between costly engagement and costly indifference.
I think each negotiation should be based on what's the best decision - taking everything into account, not taking one thing into account.
It's a lot easier to negotiate and be skillful from the majority. I want Paul Ryan negotiating with us. I don't want to have to negotiate with Paul Ryan.