There's a certain amount of disorder that has to be reorganized.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Large organization is loose organization. Nay, it would be almost as true to say that organization is always disorganization.
Reorganization to me is shuffling boxes, moving boxes around. Transformation means that you're really fundamentally changing the way the organization thinks, the way it responds, the way it leads. It's a lot more than just playing with boxes.
Factions are a sign of illness in a party.
Every reform, however necessary, will by weak minds be carried to an excess, that itself will need reforming.
There are some enterprises in which a careful disorderliness is the true method.
The trouble with organizing a thing is that pretty soon folks get to paying more attention to the organization than to what they're organized for.
One of the advantages of being disorderly is that one is constantly making exciting discoveries.
No organization, whether it's police or physicians or whatever, wants to have its errors held up to the light of day, but it's wrong, as is coming out so well.
Once you do away with the idea of people as fixed, static entities, then you see that people can change, and there is hope.
Now equilibrium is the very opposite of disorder.