I have a tendency to hire people who tend to be unattractive to the studios. Maybe this is a bad idea.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
For someone in my position, there's opportunities to be anything you want to be, even if you shouldn't be eligible, and I think that's left a bad taste in a lots of financers' and studios' mouths. Just cause someone's popular at one thing, letting them do the other isn't always the right thing.
I'm trying to work in studio movies, but they won't hire me.
Don't forget, I've been fired by studios; I'm not the studio's guy. I'm a guy who can work with studios, but if you ask any studio, I stand up to these people.
I don't like to deal with studios.
When you're not in studios, you don't have any luxuries; you can't control the elements, so you have to put up with those extremes.
Maybe studios don't want to see women acting in a way that isn't womanly. Maybe people don't.
I'm not a guy to go in the studio and spend months, let alone years, like some people do. I cannot even be in the studio for a month, it will drive me nuts.
Yet, that's what studios do. If one thing works, they'll keep doing it till it runs its course and people aren't interested anymore.
In the old days the studios guided your career. Now it's all up to you.
Obviously I don't have a stylist for everyday stuff, but for a premiere or something usually the studio will hire someone.
No opposing quotes found.