I often get letters, quite frequently, from people who say how they like the programmes a lot, but I never give credit to the almighty power that created nature.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I get a lot of letters from people.
I'm not certain that the BBC can claim to be making a wide enough range of distinctive programmes to make the case convincingly.
The BBC knew I was successful from early on, but they weren't sure why, and they still aren't sure. What I do has been unconventional from the beginning, so they've never been sure. It just works. It just does.
In my experience an appreciative letter from a fellow writer means a lot.
I get wonderful letters from kids and teachers. I must have the best readers in the world.
In the old days... it was a basic, cardinal fact that producers didn't have opinions. When I was producing natural history programmes, I didn't use them as vehicles for my own opinion. They were factual programmes.
Not every programme dealing with issues of global significance has to be fronted by last week's winner of Have I Got News For You-but I suppose you might be wrong.
I get letters from people saying one of the things they like best about what I've done since 'Bewitched' is that they never know what I'm going to do next.
The BBC produces wonderful programmes; it also produces a load of old rubbish.
I don't like celebrity programmes - but I do like programmes about how ideas are formed and evolve.
No opposing quotes found.