We wanted a pet food based on sound scientific principles and truth, not marketing hype.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Pet foods come in a variety of flavors because that's what humans like, and we assume our pets like what we like. We're wrong.
There shouldn't be an announcement that divides our food between what tastes good and what is good for us.
Consumers deserve the right to know what's in their food - and obviously, most people want that choice. It's hard to see how more knowledge about the products we eat every day can hurt us.
Poll after poll shows that consumers want the right to know what's in their food and how it's produced. Because our food choices have such a significant impact on our lives, this is a trend that should be welcomed, not frustrated.
We want our communities to know what real food is.
If food is labeled, some people might choose to eat stuff that's genetically modified. They might decide they love it. But give us a choice.
In beef trade issues, we base our decisions upon science.
Using animals for entertainment is big business, plain and simple.
If you're trying to cut down the distance travelled from the farm to your plate, it makes sense to do the same for your pet. If we all shifted our bias towards sustainable pet food, we would be helping more than just our faithful friends.
We shouldn't let anti-science zealotry shut down the ability to produce low-cost, quality food for billions across the globe.