The time has mainly gone on getting Inform into a decent shape for public use. I suppose the plot of 'Curses' makes a sequel conceivable when compared with, say, the plot of 'Hamlet' but none is planned.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I think a sequel is a waste of money and time. I think movies should illuminate new stories.
There's a real danger in doing a sequel. There are some benefits, but that all hinges on how well you execute. Quite frankly, most sequels don't execute well.
I suppose sequels are inevitable for a writer of a certain age.
When I am making a sequel, it needs to be different from what you have already seen. Yet, it needs to maintain a certain discipline so that people still associate it with the prequel.
I think sequels are fine if there's a story, so I think when there is a property that is worthy of a sequel, it could very well happen!
Nowadays it seems as though people sit down to write what they know is going to be a trilogy.
A lot of people ask for sequels, but what they really want is just to know the characters are happy and safe.
I think sequels should be earned and we won't do it unless the script is better than the first one.
There are expectations with sequels, and people want them to be bigger and better than the prequel.
The only reason ever to make a sequel is to spend more time with the characters that people love: to tell more of their story.