As soon as you've written it, you're thinking about how it can move into different mediums.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
The medium is the message.
I always try hard to arrange all media in a way so that it expresses what I want - this is not limited to one medium alone and varies from case to case.
Mediums change you by their very existence. They do this on fundamental levels because they force you to favour certain parts of your brain over others.
I say that I suffer from what Rosalind Krauss was calling the post-medium condition, where an artist essentially employs several mediums in order to bring to life whatever specific ideas that they have. For me it's always been that way.
The medium is not the message - the message is the message.
I will continue doing things irrespective of the medium as long as I'm excited about it.
The medium is the message. This is merely to say that the personal and social consequences of any medium - that is, of any extension of ourselves - result from the new scale that is introduced into our affairs by each extension of ourselves, or by any new technology.
I have always just made things. I don't see what I make as being defined by a medium or aesthetic. It probably comes more from a fundamental restlessness, an attempt to create tools for questioning or understanding, and I have always been interested in using a wide spectrum of mediums to do this.
A new medium always has a period when it is struggling inside the confining box of an earlier medium. Creators have to unlearn what they knew before they can see the fresh, uncharted vistas stretching before them.
When you're doing something where you really like the material, it doesn't matter what medium it's in.