I'm glad I made a piece of art that can be interpreted so widely. Art is always interpreted subjectively.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Art is so subjective, and people can react however they want.
Art is subjective. I'm not looking for people's praise.
I think you can appreciate different interpretations. Art is not a contest. I can even appreciate hearing someone play something in a way that I wouldn't.
Art is a subject that is inundated with opinions. In fact, that's all it is about is opinions.
Art is a subjective thing, and it should be a subjective thing. And the difficulty of subjectivity is that it becomes hugely problematized when you start applying large sums of money to art objects. That's where it all starts to get a bit sticky.
The thing about art for me is that you can go on theorising your work forever, because it's open to interpretation.
Defining art is huge; I feel like it's such a subjective thing. It's more like what's not art. You know what I mean? I think there can be an art in the way people live their lives, and art can be a gift someone gives to somebody.
I am always rethinking how art is perceived and received, questioning our relationship to art. That's always been a constant.
I was an awful critic. I operated on the assumption that there was an absolute scale of values against which art could be measured. I didn't trust my own subjective responses.
There's a point where art is not subjective, and my example for that is Picasso. If you don't like Picasso, that's your problem.